Showing posts with label Looking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Looking. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Looking at TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) Cases in Law

The TBI (traumatic brain injury) cases in law are some of the most devastating cases for the people who have been injured. The injury may have occurred due to an accident, a fall, sports injury, or even an fall or an assault the person has suffered. The survivors of these injuries are facing many years of rehabilitation that will cost a lot of money. Plus it may be something that they will need to have for the rest of their lives.

Quite often though many judges, insurance adjusters and juries will deny a person who has suffered this type of injury any compensation. People who have suffered from this type of injury are often not even taken seriously. Instead they will hear comments that will basically belittle the experience that they have gone through.

In most cases the brain injuries when they are first diagnosed will be classified as only mild. But it has been recently discovered that this may not be the case. The long term affects of such injuries can be something that will change through time. Getting possibly worse as the person ages and causing many more problems.

It is imperative that a survivor finds the right kind of injury lawyer to assist them in this type of case. You will need to find one that has experience in the area of traumatic brain injury previously. Especially if the original diagnosis was incorrect and considered only mild at the time.

There are many myths that have lead to the cases of many people being given no credit. Receiving no compensation or help for what they have faced, and are yet to face in their lives. So if you are a person who knows someone who has a personal traumatic brain injury, or has suffered one, contact the right lawyer.

A person does not need to be unconscious in order to have suffered from a brain injury. That is the number one myth about these types of injuries. Many people actually suffer an injury and have not lost consciousness at all. One great example is that of Phineas Gage, who suffered an injury from a bar going into his skull. He never once passed out from the injury but suffered many problems from the injury.

The second myth is that a person needs to be hit on the head in order to have a TBI. This again is something that is not true. Consider the instance of shaken baby syndrome, they are often not hit on the head. It is the severe whiplash that can lead to brain injury in many cases.

The third myth is that whiplash or even a concussion will not lead to anything long term. But again that is not something that is true. Many past football players and boxers who have suffered from concussions have suffered from serious long term problems and disabilities.

Another thing that is often said is that a person who complains of problems long term after a head injury are hypochondriacs. Yes you guessed it that is untrue yet again, in fact about fifteen percent of those people will actually have some sort of long term affects from the injuries they suffered. Ranging from intellectual to emotional, and personality problems.

Finally the myth that there is no proof that a mild brain injury can lead to long term problems. In fact there have been many studies that have shown that they do cause long term disabilities in some cases.

Friday, April 2, 2010

New York Accident Lawyers

New York City, a bustling megapolis, inhabited by millions of people and visited by millions of tourists each year. With an increase in population and increase in economy, it is but natural that there will be an increase in cars. The city has millions of cars, motorbikes, trucks and other vehicles plying its narrow and congested roads. So, it is but natural that there will be accidents.

Each year there are many accidents in New York, some minor and some that are fatal. Accidents happen due to negligence of the drivers or the pedestrians, driving conditions or the influence of drugs or alcohol. If one party is at fault the other party just happened to innocently be there at the wrong time, in the wrong place and becomes an unfortunate victim of the accident.

Justice is required and compensation needed. Compensation for the damage caused to life or property should be paid by the defaulter. But these things are decided in the court of law, and it is necessary that a good, responsible lawyer represent the injured party in court.

There are many lawyers in and around the city who specialize in helping victims of such accident cases. They are experts in the traffic law, rules and regulations of New York. They are well experienced in injury & accident cases, especially those that take place in New York.

If you have suffered an injury in an accident in New York, do look up a resourceful, skilled and experienced New York accident lawyer to fight for your case, and get you the deserved compensation for your injury. If you have lost a loved one in a car accident, you should seek the assistance of a qualified accident lawyer.

Looking Through the MIST - Minor Impact Soft Tissue Injury

As a personal injury attorney in California I, or an attorney anywhere else for that matter can tell you, low impact cases resulting in soft tissue types of injuries, including whiplash, are specifically "red flagged" by the insurance industry as cases meriting special attention. Such cases have been labeled by the code word "MIST", short for Minor Impact Soft Tissue injury. The idea behind the "MIST" injury originated with insurance companies to allow for lower pay outs for claims resulting in little or no damage to the vehicles involved in an auto accident, and to also permit the insurance companies to pay less for injury claims that cannot be easily seen by the naked eye.

MIST cases are typically denied in their entirety by the defendant's insurance company. If the MIST claims are not denied categorically, the defendant's insurance company will often make an extremely low offer to settle, often not enough to even cover all the related injury expenses. This holds true even in cases where the defendant is clearly at fault in the accident. What can be even more frustrating is the fact that often, fault is admitted by the defendant in the accident. The insurance companies simply state that these "low ball" settlement offers are in keeping with what they see jury verdicts rendering in these kinds of related personal injury cases. As a result of the difficulty in litigating MIST injuries, many personal injury attorneys will no longer accept auto accident cases involving low property damage to a vehicle when the injury involved is a soft tissue injury.

The difficulty of litigating soft tissue injuries creates a quandary, leaving an auto accident victim with only two options: accepting the insurance company settlement offer or proceeding to take the defendant to court. Although one does not have to accept an insurance company settlement offer, there are a several facts to keep in mind during the decision making process. The first thing to remember is that going to court involves a substantial commitment of time for both the representing attorney and the recovering client. The second idea to consider is that bringing a case to trial and ultimately through to a verdict is often costly in terms of the expenses required to so, including but not limited to the costs of specialists, medical experts, and accident re-constructionists. Thirdly, it must also be noted that litigation can be risky and that there are absolutely no guarantees as to a successful result. It is up to the client to request their personal injury attorney to proceed through a cost-benefit analysis to determine if the case can be successfully litigated in a cost effective manner.

For victims of MIST injuries, it is important to engage in an active discussion about the possible outcomes of the options comprising soft tissue litigation. It is also important that one question their attorney about the bottom line when obtaining advice for an appropriate course of action to best resolve the soft tissue injury case.